Category talk:Peer Property
From P2P Foundation
Use of this category
Does it make sense to create a new category Peer Property, when there is already a well stocked out Peerproperty category? A possibility would be to have Peer Governance, Peer Property, Peer Production with all the items already in their pre-existing equivalents Peerproperty etc.. At the time I create does categorynames I didn't realize you could use separated words in a category. Michel--Mbauwens 12:07, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
- Indeed, it does not make sense to keep this page. I ll have a look to what this category is linked to. I dont remember the context in which it was created. Feel free to delete this one ( http://p2pfoundation.net/Category:Peer_Property ) , and transfer anything from this page to the well documented one you mention : http://p2pfoundation.net/Category:Peerproperty
--Dante
- I created this category for several reason. 1, to create a directory for resource collections. Originally this category redirected to Category peergovernance. 2. Pages that receive a treatment for the P2P Collaboration Stack end up in the new Peer Property Category. This is a filing issue, and does not effect usability for anyone else. The category P2P Concept Groups is also a filing utility for the Collaboration stack. As it does not harm anyone, I will now restore it to this category. You can navigrate all the way down through Category:P2P Foundation to the Category:P2P Resource Collections or you can get their through Category:P2P Collaboration Stack which integrates oroginal content into the wiki through another set of complimentary categories. This does not damage as far as I can tell. If people want traffic they can always add to Category:Peerproduction. The plan is to proceed this way for a time that allows a team to traverse the Peerproduction articles and to, at some point, if it is decided, to merge the categories into or other properly formatted categories as appropriate. More about this approach can be found on the P2P Collaboration Stack Architecture article. --Alex Rollin 12:58, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
- OK ! :) --Dante
- I created this category for several reason. 1, to create a directory for resource collections. Originally this category redirected to Category peergovernance. 2. Pages that receive a treatment for the P2P Collaboration Stack end up in the new Peer Property Category. This is a filing issue, and does not effect usability for anyone else. The category P2P Concept Groups is also a filing utility for the Collaboration stack. As it does not harm anyone, I will now restore it to this category. You can navigrate all the way down through Category:P2P Foundation to the Category:P2P Resource Collections or you can get their through Category:P2P Collaboration Stack which integrates oroginal content into the wiki through another set of complimentary categories. This does not damage as far as I can tell. If people want traffic they can always add to Category:Peerproduction. The plan is to proceed this way for a time that allows a team to traverse the Peerproduction articles and to, at some point, if it is decided, to merge the categories into or other properly formatted categories as appropriate. More about this approach can be found on the P2P Collaboration Stack Architecture article. --Alex Rollin 12:58, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
