Co-Mantua: Difference between revisions

From P2P Foundation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with " =Description= Christian Ianone: "We are going to launch what we call Co-Mantua, a prototype of an institution to run the city as a "co-city" based on what I call collabora...")
 
No edit summary
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
Christian Ianone:
Christian Ianone:


"We are going to launch what we call Co-Mantua, a prototype of an institution to run the city as a "co-city" based on what I call collaborative governance of the commons whereby urban and cultural commons are co-managed by social innovators (i.e. makers, active citizens, digital innovators, (r)urban innovators, etc.), public authorities, businesses, civil society organizations, experts/schools/universities through an institutionalised public-private-people partnership. This partnership will give birth to a local p2p physical and institutional platform with three main aims: living together (collaborative services), growing together (co-ventures), making together (co-production).  
"Co-Mantua is a prototype of an institutionalizing process to run the city as a collaborative
The project is sustained by the local Chamber of Commerce, the City, the Province, local ONGs and the University."
commons and therefore as a "co-city". A co-city should be based on collaborative
governance of the commons whereby urban, environmental, cultural, knowledge and digital
commons are co-managed by the five actors of the collaborative governance - social
innovators (i.e. active citizens, makers, digital innovators, urban regenerators, rurban
innovators, etc.), public authorities, businesses, civil society organizations, knowledge
institutions (i.e. schools, universities, cultural academies, etc.) - through an
institutionalized public-private-people/community partnership. This partnership will
give birth to a local p2p physical, digital and institutional platform with three main aims:
living together (collaborative services), growing together (co-ventures), making together
(co-production). The project is supported by the local Chamber of Commerce, the City, the
Province, local ONGs, SMEs and knowledge institutions, such as the Mantua University
Foundation and some local schools."
 
=Principles=
 
From a draft document:
 
- Mutual trust: based on the public prerogatives regarding supervision, planning and
control, the Administration and the active citizens shape their relationships to the mutual trust and they presuppose that the respective will of collaboration is oriented
to the pursuit of purposes of general interest.
 
- Publicity and transparency: the Administration guarantees the largest knowledge of
the partnership opportunities, of the proposals received, of the forms of aid assigned,
of the decisions taken, of the results and of the valuations made. It recognizes in the
transparency the main tool to ensure fairness in the relationship with the active
citizens and verifiability of the actions made and the results obtained.
 
- Responsibility: the Administration values its responsibility and the citizens'
responsibility as a key factor in the relationship with the citizens, as well as a
necessary prerequisite in order for the partnership to be effectively oriented to the
production of useful and measurable outcomes.
 
- Inclusiveness and openness: the interventions of care and regeneration of the
commons must be organised in order to allow any interested citizens to join the
activities at any time.
 
- Sustainability: the Administration, in the exercise of discretion in making decisions,
verifies that the collaboration with citizens does not cause greater costs than benefits,
and that it does not determine negative consequences on the environmental
equilibrium.
 
- Proportionality: the Administration ensure that the administrative requirements, the
guarantees and the quality standards required for the proposal, the preliminary
investigation and the execution of the collaborative interventions, are commensurate
with the real needs of protection of the public interests involved.4
 
- Adequacy and differentiation: the forms of collaboration among citizens and the
Administration are adequate to the needs of care and regeneration of the urban
commons and they are differentiated depending on the type or on the nature of the
urban common and on the people whose well-being it is functional to.
 
- Informality: the Administration demands that the partnership with the citizens takes
place in accordance with the requested formalities only when it is provided for by
law. In the rest of the cases it ensures flexibility and simplicity in the relationship, as
long as it is possible to guarantee the respect of the public ethic, as it is regulated by
the code of conduct of the public sector employees, and the respect of the principles
of impartiality, efficiency, transparency and judicial certainty.
 
- Local democracy: the pact guarantees equality between parties and subscribers and
the attribution of reciprocal rights and duties. The pact pursues the improvement of
the quality of local democracy;
 
- Public autonomy: the pact signatories act as "public actors", holding the ability to
take care of the general interest;
 
- Horizontal subsidiarity: the pact was made possible thanks to the participation of all
the parties, which got activated in a collaborative and mutually supportive way, even
delegating specific functions if acquitted by others more effectively, in the pursuit of
the common good. According to this principle the care of collective needs and the
activities of general interest are provided directly by private citizens (both as
individuals and as members) and the entities involved in 'subsidiary' function,
programming, coordinating and possibly managing.5
 
- Legality: the compliance with the principles and rules dictated or accepted in the
legal system is the cornerstone on which the entry and stay in the pact is based. The
law is intended not only as a means of guarantee for civil coexistence within and
outside of the pact, but also as a fundamental tool of cultivation of social cohesion
and competitiveness of the territory."





Revision as of 10:22, 24 November 2014


Description

Christian Ianone:

"Co-Mantua is a prototype of an institutionalizing process to run the city as a collaborative commons and therefore as a "co-city". A co-city should be based on collaborative governance of the commons whereby urban, environmental, cultural, knowledge and digital commons are co-managed by the five actors of the collaborative governance - social innovators (i.e. active citizens, makers, digital innovators, urban regenerators, rurban innovators, etc.), public authorities, businesses, civil society organizations, knowledge institutions (i.e. schools, universities, cultural academies, etc.) - through an institutionalized public-private-people/community partnership. This partnership will give birth to a local p2p physical, digital and institutional platform with three main aims: living together (collaborative services), growing together (co-ventures), making together (co-production). The project is supported by the local Chamber of Commerce, the City, the Province, local ONGs, SMEs and knowledge institutions, such as the Mantua University Foundation and some local schools."

Principles

From a draft document:

- Mutual trust: based on the public prerogatives regarding supervision, planning and control, the Administration and the active citizens shape their relationships to the mutual trust and they presuppose that the respective will of collaboration is oriented to the pursuit of purposes of general interest.

- Publicity and transparency: the Administration guarantees the largest knowledge of the partnership opportunities, of the proposals received, of the forms of aid assigned, of the decisions taken, of the results and of the valuations made. It recognizes in the transparency the main tool to ensure fairness in the relationship with the active citizens and verifiability of the actions made and the results obtained.

- Responsibility: the Administration values its responsibility and the citizens' responsibility as a key factor in the relationship with the citizens, as well as a necessary prerequisite in order for the partnership to be effectively oriented to the production of useful and measurable outcomes.

- Inclusiveness and openness: the interventions of care and regeneration of the commons must be organised in order to allow any interested citizens to join the activities at any time.

- Sustainability: the Administration, in the exercise of discretion in making decisions, verifies that the collaboration with citizens does not cause greater costs than benefits, and that it does not determine negative consequences on the environmental equilibrium.

- Proportionality: the Administration ensure that the administrative requirements, the guarantees and the quality standards required for the proposal, the preliminary investigation and the execution of the collaborative interventions, are commensurate with the real needs of protection of the public interests involved.4

- Adequacy and differentiation: the forms of collaboration among citizens and the Administration are adequate to the needs of care and regeneration of the urban commons and they are differentiated depending on the type or on the nature of the urban common and on the people whose well-being it is functional to.

- Informality: the Administration demands that the partnership with the citizens takes place in accordance with the requested formalities only when it is provided for by law. In the rest of the cases it ensures flexibility and simplicity in the relationship, as long as it is possible to guarantee the respect of the public ethic, as it is regulated by the code of conduct of the public sector employees, and the respect of the principles of impartiality, efficiency, transparency and judicial certainty.

- Local democracy: the pact guarantees equality between parties and subscribers and the attribution of reciprocal rights and duties. The pact pursues the improvement of the quality of local democracy;

- Public autonomy: the pact signatories act as "public actors", holding the ability to take care of the general interest;

- Horizontal subsidiarity: the pact was made possible thanks to the participation of all the parties, which got activated in a collaborative and mutually supportive way, even delegating specific functions if acquitted by others more effectively, in the pursuit of the common good. According to this principle the care of collective needs and the activities of general interest are provided directly by private citizens (both as individuals and as members) and the entities involved in 'subsidiary' function, programming, coordinating and possibly managing.5

- Legality: the compliance with the principles and rules dictated or accepted in the legal system is the cornerstone on which the entry and stay in the pact is based. The law is intended not only as a means of guarantee for civil coexistence within and outside of the pact, but also as a fundamental tool of cultivation of social cohesion and competitiveness of the territory."